Ideal types in Weber\'s concept

And concord to B.Kroche all bit-to-man is the affair of contemplation, and the construct does non compensate with the uniform single (things, people), and on the dealings between private events. As an psycheistic, things low flavor never be shvacheni by dint of concepts - they usher out only be objects of contemplation. The concept of the individual, correspond to Croce, is a contradiction in terms in the definition, so you keep do a attainment of the individual as a dodge of concepts. It is a affaire of individual get word fraud. As the chronicle has to do with the individual, as manifested in time, it overly is a diversity of art. Philosophical and rangeological origination of story because it is not logic, and aesthetics: the logic deals with cosmopolitan concepts, and aesthetics - from individual friendships. But we should not forget that the ruler of logic - the truth, and the belief of aesthetics - beauty. (It fairish felt Croce opponents, among whom was weber). The basis for the distinction of historic informations, general light of nuance and the graphic learnings in Dilthey and Croce, we provide see that variant. Dilthey, contemplating support as a philosopher, distinguishes between unchanging life and living(a) soul and in accordance with the modes of intuition authoriseing these different structures. But Croce comes from the detail that both in nature and in man do-nothing identify individual and general, individual - the subject of the story, which therefore is a native art in everyday - a proceeds of logic, that is the subject of acquaintance in the broadest reek of the word. However, the results of both methods of ratiocination turns out gross: orient knowledge, intuition is accepted as a method of the ethnical sciences, arts, confirmatory knowledge, discussion - as a method of the natural sciences.\nIncidentally, the psychological study of homophileities from the beginning had a vuln erable sharpen: knowledge gained straightway through intuition, through the use of perceptiveness into the world of anothers soul, not of the zahalnoznachy roughlyi is a incumbent guarantee of the dependability of knowledge. For Croce, who initially claimed that the knowledge of the individual indoors the scope of aesthetics, no zahalnoznachymosti not considered a disadvantage, but Dilthey, who seek to build on a young foundation of most of the humanities, it was a bighearted difficulty. How to ensure the cultural sciences the same abrasiveness and zahalnoznachymist owned science - its what Dilthey throughout life.\nThis problem zahalnoznachymosti science of culture has become a central publication of research Weber. In one question, Weber was agreed with Dilthey, Myunsterberhom and associates - he shargond their antynaturalizm, cosmos sure that analyzing human activities, can not come from the same methodological principles that follows the moon, studying celestial bod ies. equal Dilthey, Weber believed that missing from the fact that man is a conscious, can neither historiographer nor a sociologist or economist. But command by the study of social life by direct penetration, intuition, he resolutely refused, as a result of this method of study has zahalnoznachymosti. The science of culture, what it wants to create Dilthey, it appears too art, because in order to become a science, it must contract the following methodological principles that can be transferred to all. According to Weber, the chief(prenominal) error Dilthey and thinkers well-nigh to it - is psychology. The essence of the psychology, as it instructs in its time, Kant, and him and modern and E.Husserl, is that according to the psychological, rational acts and processes as are occurring all the activities of consciousness, including cognitive activity determine the content of knowledge, proficient as the bring into being of the letters that make up the word, defines the subject matter of the word.