Fruit of Divorce Essay Example for Free

Fruit of Divorce Essay The increasing number of divorce and separation issues among families has sprouted an immense change in the behavior of children, specifically on negative characteristics that has in a way or another spurred debates and deliberations both in the state and in the country. Studies show that changes in marriage, divorce and fertility have led to distinction in family structures—overt interparental conflict, poor parenting and economic hardship—these however, are found to be conjointly predicting the behavior of preadolescent and early adolescent youth. The identification of specific factors that place youth at risk for behavioral and emotional problems has concerned social scientists for years. As a matter of fact, several literary social scientists have commenced studies on determining the factors that may have led juvenile delinquents to their absurd conditions and in most cases, they incorporate psychological aide to prevent such results in the long run. Further, in an article written by Shannon E. Cavanagh and Aletha C. Huston, their study expressed the dilemma in which family instability sprouts and affects children (Cavanagh Huston, 2006). Findings from their study support the pattern of independent, additive effects of individual family stressors and variances that include other social factors that may have led to the behavior of a child. Even though their research only scaled quite a number of respondents, they were able to come up with a pattern, which they expressed to diagrams, on the level of sensitivity and behavior of children not only to their parents but including their teachers and relatives. In order to give weight on the study, the University of Texas at Austin authors paved a way in portraying the common grounds of family instability by relating the behavioral transitions to previously published related studies. Initially, the authors presented an array of ideas on the concept of an American Family while incorporating statistical details on perspectives that involved common family dilemmas or histories that constitute major stressors in a child’s life (Cavanagh Huston, 2006). In such way, they are able to set the evaluative factors of their study hence not undermining the importance of reviewing related literature. The aim or the objectives of the study were thoroughly defined—describe the histories of family instability during the preschool years for children born into different family structures; examine how family instability from birth through early childhood affect childrens problem behavior during the transition into formal education; and explore how the developmental significance of family instability is exacerbated or reduced by initial family structure as well as the material, social and emotional resources of the home, in order to identify circumstances in which children are most and least vulnerable to family instability. Further, their sampling procedure, with National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development (NICHD SECCYD) as sample in the comprehensive longitudinal study gave concise results. With 120 child behaviors and 34 items of problem conducts, each teacher has been asked to describe the child for the past two months scaling each behavior with 3 choices in accordance to frequency. Taken as a whole, offspring whose mothers had stumpy typical levels and waning levels of maternal compassion towards their nursery years patented further problem manners in the classroom, as any person could apparently anticipate. In essence, the primary rationale of SECCYD was to identify the implication of progression of early child care, on the other hand, the extensiveness and profundity of data collected branched valuable resources for studying the development of youth overall.In the light, the study still has limitations which I believe still needs to be addressed in a more meticulous and comprehensive study or research. Reference Cavanagh, S. E. , Huston, A. C. (2006). Family Instability and Childrens Early Problem Behavior. Social Forces, 85(1), 551-581.