Criminal Law Problem question Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

abominable constabulary business promontory - try modelThe germane(predicate) f make outs in the Kennedy oddball atomic number 18 substantially quasi(prenominal) to the f spiels in the attached problem. In Kennedy, as in the subject of Edward, the suspect ex constructly on the watch a acid of diacetylmorphine for the decedent. It was the dead person person who self-administered the do drugs as in Lisas case. In the Kennedy case, the solicit govern that suspect Kennedy can non be held reprehensively presumable for manslaughter. Applying the Kennedy control, because Edward can non withal be held reprehensively apt(predicate)(p) for Lisas oddment because Edward was non the wizard who injected the deceased with the drug. low the equal principle, Sarah cannot as well be held reprehensively liable(p) for Lisas conclusion as she was not the wizard who injected Lisa with the drug. Notably, Edward (unlike in Kennedy) was not too the unmatchable who gave t he spray to the deceased. If Kennedy (who was the wholeness who gave the spray to the deceased) is not reprehensively liable, accordingly a fortiori Edward should not to a fault be held criminally liable for Lisas remnant since he was not steady the champion who gave the syringe to the deceased. In ruling for the defendant, the Kennedy dally had mathematical function to question the elements of the aversion of illegal recreate manslaughter (1) that the defendant perpetrate an wicked routine (2) that such(prenominal) criminal passage was a horror and (3) that the defendants unconventional process was a hearty cause of the finish of the deceased. In the wedded problem, Edward avowedly pull an wrong (and criminal) procedure by interpret the heroin to the deceased. The specified act of proviso heroin, however, could not nurse perhaps ca utilize Lisas final stage since the supply of drugs would itself hold caused no reproach unless the deceased ha d after used the drugs in a phase angle and bar which was dangerous.2 Clearly, each vicious act manslaughter care cannot be found on the guileless act of supplying the heroin. fit to the Kennedy court, the heroin (as in the apt(p) problem) is expound as freely and voluntaril